Use primary sources first
Product claims are checked against official websites, help centers, app listings, privacy policies, and other first-party documentation whenever those materials are available.
How Kenegdo researches and maintains platform comparisons.
Comparison pages should help readers identify meaningful differences without pretending every platform serves the same audience or stays unchanged forever.
Compare workflows, not slogans
The main criteria are profile visibility, how discovery starts, when photographs or identity appear, the role of matchmakers, communication flow, and which audience the product says it serves.
Date material claims
Products change. Comparison pages display a reviewed date and source links so readers can check whether a feature or policy has moved since the page was written.
Separate fact from fit
A factual feature difference is not the same as a universal recommendation. Each page should explain which type of user may prefer either approach.
Correct errors
Kenegdo is not affiliated with the compared services. Platform representatives or readers can send a primary source to support@kenegdo.app when a factual statement needs review.
Related Kenegdo topics
Questions
What people ask before joining
These answers are intentionally aligned with the main Kenegdo FAQ: private discovery, shadchan guidance, and serious fit before exposure.
Does Kenegdo accept payment for comparison placement?
No paid comparison placement is described in this methodology.
How often are comparisons updated?
They are reviewed when meaningful changes are identified, with the latest review date shown on the comparison page.
Can a competitor request a correction?
Yes. Send the relevant page and a current primary source to support@kenegdo.app for review.